Lower extremity arterial disease vs. coronary artery disease: mortality differences after revascularization.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients undergoing revascularization for lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) may face a higher risk of mortality than those with coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to characterize the difference in mortality risk between patients undergoing revascularization for LEAD and CAD and identify associated factors. METHODS: The 1-year database of 10 754 patients undergoing revascularization for CAD (n = 6349) and LEAD (n = 4405) was analysed. Poisson regression models were used to characterize interpopulation differences in mortality, adjusting for baseline clinical features, including age, sex, polyvascular disease, comorbidities, medications, and vulnerabilities. RESULTS: Individuals with LEAD were older, were more likely to have polyvascular disease, had more comorbidities, and received fewer cardioprotective drugs than those with CAD. Vulnerabilities remained more common in the LEAD group even after adjusting for these clinical features. The crude risk ratio of mortality incidence for LEAD vs. CAD was 2.91 (95% confidence interval, 2.54-3.34), attenuated to 2.14 (1.83-2.50) after controlling for age, sex, and polyvascular disease. The percentage attenuation in the excessive mortality associated with LEAD was 29%. The stepwise addition of comorbidities, medications, and vulnerabilities as adjusting factors attenuated the incidence risk ratio to 1.48 (1.26-1.72), 1.33 (1.12-1.58), and 1.17 (0.98-1.39), respectively, and increased the percentage attenuation to 64%, 73%, and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality risk was almost three-fold higher in patients undergoing revascularization for LEAD than in those with CAD. The excessive mortality was considerably attributable to inter-group differences in baseline characteristics, including potentially clinically or socially modifiable factors.

Impact of baseline yellow plaque assessed by coronary angioscopy on vascular response after stent implantation.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between baseline yellow plaque (YP) and vascular response after stent implantation has not been fully investigated. METHODS: This was a sub-analysis of the Collaboration-1 study (multicenter, retrospective, observational study). A total of 88 lesions from 80 patients with chronic coronary syndrome who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were analyzed. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and coronary angioscopy (CAS) were serially performed immediately and 11 months after stent implantation. YP was defined as the stented segment with yellow or intensive yellow color assessed by CAS. Neoatherosclerosis was defined as a lipid or calcified neointima assessed by OCT. OCT and CAS findings at 11 months were compared between lesions with baseline YP (YP group) and lesions without baseline YP (Non-YP group). RESULTS: Baseline YP was detected in 37 lesions (42 %). OCT findings at 11 months showed that the incidence of neoatherosclerosis was significantly higher in the YP group (11 % versus 0 %, p = 0.028) and mean neointimal thickness tended to be lower (104 ±â€¯43 µm versus 120 ±â€¯48 µm, p = 0.098). CAS findings at 11 months demonstrated that the dominant and minimum neointimal coverage grades were significantly lower (p = 0.049 and P = 0.026) and maximum yellow color grade was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the YP group. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline YP affected the incidence of neoatherosclerosis as well as poor neointimal coverage at 11 months after stent implantation.

Polymer-based drug-eluting stent treatment extends the time to reintervention for patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease: clinical evidence and potential economic value.

Aim: Use long-term follow-up data from the IMPERIAL study to determine whether drug-eluting polymer-based nitinol stent treatment can delay the time to repeat intervention for femoropopliteal artery disease and how such a delay may result in cost savings in a value-based episode of care. Patients & methods: The IMPERIAL randomized controlled trial was an international study of a paclitaxel-eluting polymer-coated stent (Eluvia, Boston Scientific, MA, USA) versus a polymer-free paclitaxel-coated stent (Zilver PTX, Cook Corporation, IN, USA) for treating lesions of the femoropopliteal arterial segment. Study patients (n = 465) had symptomatic lower limb ischemia. Safety and efficacy assessments were performed through 5 years. Mean time to first reintervention was calculated in post-hoc analysis for patients who underwent a clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) through 3 or 5 years following the index procedure. To simulate potential cost savings associated with differential CD-TLR burden over time, a cost-avoidance analysis using input parameters from IMPERIAL and US 100% Medicare standard analytical files was developed. Results: Among patients with a first CD-TLR through 3 years of follow-up, mean time to reintervention was 5.5 months longer (difference 166 days, 95% CI: 51, 282 days; p = 0.0058) for patients treated with Eluvia (n = 56) than for those treated with Zilver PTX (n = 30). Through the 5-year study follow-up period, CD-TLR rates were 29.3% (68/232) for Eluvia and 34.2% (39/114) for Zilver PTX (p = 0.3540) and mean time to first reintervention exceeded 2 years for patients treated with Eluvia at 737 days versus 645 days for the Zilver PTX group (difference 92 days, 95% CI: -85, 269 days; p = 0.3099). Simulated savings considering reinterventions occurring over 1 and 5 years following initial use of Eluvia over Zilver PTX were US $1,395,635 and US $1,531,795, respectively, when IMPERIAL CD-TLR rates were extrapolated to 1000 patients. Conclusion: IMPERIAL data suggest initial treatment with Eluvia extends the time patients spend without undergoing reintervention. This extension may be associated with cost savings in relevant time frames.

Pathological evaluation of a fluoropolymer-based drug-eluting stent in an arteriovenous graft outflow venous stenosis.

A fluoropolymer-based drug-eluting stent was implanted in an arteriovenous graft outflow venous stenosis. Two and a half years later, due to a local infection, the stent was removed surgically, and a pathological evaluation was conducted. The stent struts exhibited partial endothelial cell coverage, with the remaining surface predominantly covered by fibrin. Notably, there was no evidence of restenosis or aneurysmal change.

Three-year clinical course after fluoropolymer-based drug-eluting stent implantation for femoropopliteal lesions.

BACKGROUND: Although the 1-year clinical outcomes of fluoropolymer-based drug-eluting stents (FP-DES) were favorable for the treatment of real-world femoropopliteal lesions in symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD), their performance beyond 1 year remained unknown. The current study determined the 3-year clinical course of FP-DES implantation for real-world femoropopliteal lesions. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, observational study evaluated 1204 limbs (chronic limb-threatening ischemia, 34.8%; mean lesion length, 18.6 ± 9.9 cm, chronic total occlusion: 53.2%) of 1097 patients with PAD (age, 75 ± 9 years; diabetes mellitus, 60.8%) undergoing FP-DES implantation for femoropopliteal lesions. The primary outcome measure was 3-year restenosis. The secondary outcome measures included 3-year occlusive restenosis, stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and aneurysmal degeneration. RESULTS: The 3-year cumulative occurrence of restenosis was 27.3%, whereas that of occlusive restenosis, stent thrombosis, and TLR was 16.1%, 7.3%, and 19.6%, respectively. The annual occurrence of restenosis decreased by 12.0%, 9.5%, and 5.8% in the first, second, and third year, respectively (p < 0.001). Similarly, the rates of occlusive restenosis and stent thrombosis decreased (p < 0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively), whereas the rate of TLR remained unchanged for 3 years (p = 0.15). The incidence of aneurysmal degeneration at 3 years (15.7%) did not significantly differ from that at 1 and 2 years (p = 0.69 and 0.20, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the favorable long-term clinical course of FP-DES in real-world practice, emphasizing the importance of monitoring for occlusive restenosis and stent thrombosis while considering the potential onset of aneurysmal degeneration.

Intraluminal vs Subintimal Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Chronic Total Occlusions.

BACKGROUND: Whether intraluminal drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty is superior to subintimal DCB angioplasty regarding femoropopliteal (FP) chronic total occlusion (CTO) outcomes has not been systematically determined. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the 1-year clinical outcomes of intraluminal and subintimal DCB angioplasty for the treatment of patients with symptomatic FP CTO. METHODS: This subanalysis of POPCORN (Prospective Multi-Center Registry of Drug-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Disease) evaluated 469 lesions in 469 symptomatic patients with lower extremity artery disease who presented with FP CTO and underwent DCB treatment. Wire passage (intraluminal vs subintimal) was evaluated using intravascular ultrasound. The outcome measure, 1-year freedom from restenosis, was compared between subintimal and intraluminal DCB angioplasty groups after propensity score matching analysis. The Institutional Review Boards of participating centers approved this study. Informed consent was obtained from the participants or their families. RESULTS: During the median follow-up period of 14.2 months, restenosis occurred in 140 patients. After propensity score matching, the subintimal group had a significantly lower 1-year rate of freedom from restenosis than the intraluminal group (77.0% vs 84.2%, respectively; P = 0.024). Interaction analysis revealed a more marked increased risk for restenosis in the subintimal DCB angioplasty group in patients with severe calcification, low-dose DCB use, or smoking. CONCLUSIONS: The present study revealed that intraluminal DCB angioplasty was superior to subintimal DCB angioplasty for FP CTO treatment, with a significantly better 1-year rate of freedom from restenosis.

Five-year outcomes of the GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis for the treatment of complex femoropopliteal lesions from a Japanese postmarket surveillance study.

Introduction: The safety and effectiveness of the GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis for treatment of symptomatic patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and complex femoropopliteal (FP) lesions was assessed in a real-world Japanese practice setting. Methods: A prospective, multicenter, postmarket surveillance study was conducted from 2016 to 2017 at 64 sites in Japan. Symptomatic patients with PAD and FP lesions ⩾ 10 cm and reference vessel diameters ranging from 4.0 to 7.5 mm were eligible for enrollment. Outcome measures evaluated at 5 years were primary patency (PP), primary-assisted patency (PAP), secondary patency (SP), freedom from target lesion revascularization (fTLR), occurrence of device- or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs), and stent fractures. Results: A total of 321 patients were enrolled and were a mean age of 73.9 ± 8.7 years; 77.3% were men and 26.5% had chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). The mean lesion length was 23.6 ± 6.6 cm and the frequency with TASC II C/D lesions and chronic total occlusions was 86.6% and 70.4%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimated PP, PAP, SP, and fTLR at 5 years was 62.4%, 74.1%, 82.3%, and 75.9%, respectively. The mean ankle-brachial index was 0.92 ± 0.15 and the mean improvement in Rutherford class was 2.3 ± 1.4, which was maintained through 5 years. The rate of cumulative device- or procedure-related SAEs through 5 years was 19.9% with only 9.3% of those occurring after the first year. No stent fractures were observed through 5 years by x-ray evaluation. Conclusion: The 5-year safety and efficacy outcomes of the endoprosthesis were clinically acceptable for treating complex FP lesions in a real-world cohort of Japanese patients with PAD. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04706273).

Below-the-Knee Endovascular Revascularization: A Position Statement.

Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia, the terminal stage of peripheral artery disease, are frequently afflicted by below-the-knee disease. Although all patients should receive guideline-directed medical therapy, restoration of inline flow is oftentimes necessary to avoid limb loss. Proper patient selection and proficiency in endovascular techniques for below-the-knee revascularization are intended to prevent major amputation and promote wound healing. This review, a consensus among an international panel of experienced operators, provides guidance on these challenges from an endovascular perspective and offers techniques to navigate this complex disease process.

Impact of Procedural Techniques on Midterm Patency of Fluoropolymer-Based Drug-Eluting Stent Placed in the Femoropopliteal Artery.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of compliance with recommended procedural techniques on the midterm patency of a fluoropolymer-based drug-eluting stent (FP-DES) in the femoropopliteal artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 200 femoropopliteal lesions (chronic limb-threatening ischemia, 59%; chronic total occlusion, 41%) in 173 patients (male, 66%; diabetes mellitus, 62%; hemodialysis, 40%) with lower extremity arterial disease who underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided endovascular therapy with FP-DES between January 2016 and July 2021. The primary outcome measure was restenosis, defined as a peak systolic velocity ratio of >2.4 based on the duplex US findings. The association between procedural techniques and incidence of restenosis was investigated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: The 2-year cumulative incidence of restenosis was 19.5% (SD ± 3.3). Multivariate analysis revealed that noncompliance with recommended procedural techniques, such as plaque burden at the stent edge of <50%, a minimum stent area (MSA) of >12 mm2, and stent placement within the P1 segment, was independently associated with an increased risk of restenosis (hazard ratios [HRs], 3.22, 4.71, and 4.67 and P = .004, P < .001, and P < .001, respectively). The 2-year restenosis risk for procedures performed in compliance with all 3-technical criteria was 8.4% (SD ± 3.4), whereas the risks for those in compliance with 2-technical criteria or 0- or 1-technical criteria were 25.0% (SD ± 6.2) and 48.6% (SD ± 10.4), respectively. HRs relative to 3-technical criteria compliance were 3.79 (P = .007) and 11.85 (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Noncompliance with recommended procedural techniques, including plaque burden at the stent edge of <50%, MSA of >12 mm2, and stent placement within the P1 segment, was significantly associated with an increased risk of 2-year restenosis after FP-DES implantation in the femoropopliteal artery.

Ultrasound-Assessed Lesion Morphology and Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for de novo Dysfunctional Arteriovenous Fistula in Hemodialysis Patients.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ultrasound-assessed lesion morphology on the outcomes of drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) treatment for de novo dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) lesions. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study enrolled 114 consecutive patients (mean age, 73 ± 10 years; male, 69%) with de novo dysfunctional AVF lesions who underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) using DCB (n = 48) and POBA (n = 66). The morphology of the stenotic lesions, evaluated using ultrasonography, was classified into intimal hyperplasia and shrinking types. The outcome measure was 12-month primary patency. Factors associated with loss of primary patency were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the 2 treatment groups. The 12-month primary patency rate was significantly higher in the DCB group than in the POBA group (66.8 ± 7.1% versus 35.9 ± 6.3%, P = .006). The 12-month primary patency rate in the lesions with intimal hyperplasia type was not significantly different (DCB: 70.3 ± 9.5% versus POBA: 45.9 ± 8.0%; P = .310), whereas that in the shrinking type was significantly higher in the DCB group than in the POBA group (61.9 ± 10.6% versus 15.2 ± 8.1%; P < .001). The interaction analysis demonstrated that lesion morphology had a significantly different hazard ratio (HR) for restenosis between the POBA and DCB groups (P for interaction = .031). The multivariate analysis revealed that DCB usage (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.28, 0.87]; P = .015), ultrasound-assessed lesion morphology (shrinking type: aHR, 1.77; 95% CI: [1.07, 2.93]; P = .026), and location of stenosis (aHR, 2.26; 95% CI: 1.15, 4.46; P = .018) were significantly associated with AVF patency after PTA. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that lesion morphology evaluated using ultrasonography had a differential impact on DCB and POBA outcomes. The therapeutic effect of DCB was unexpectedly confirmed in the shrinking type. CLINICAL IMPACT: The effectiveness of DCB in inhibiting smooth muscle cell proliferation in intimal hyperplasia lesions was expected based on the known mechanism of action of paclitaxel. However the therapeutic effect of DCB was unexpectedly confirmed in the shrinking type too. We may not need to hesitate usage of DCB for shrinking type.

Comparing Predictors Influencing Restenosis Following High-Dose Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty and Fluoropolymer-Based Drug-Eluting Stenting in Femoropopliteal Artery Lesions.

PURPOSE: Despite widespread use of anti-restenosis devices, drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents (DESs), their appropriate use for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions has not been well investigated and the risk factors for restenosis have not been compared. To investigate risk factors associated with restenosis after endovascular therapy using DCB and DES for contemporary FP lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center, retrospective, observational study evaluated 378 FP lesions in 273 patients treated with DCB (278 lesions in 193 patients) or DES (120 lesions in 106 patients). The DCB used was high-dose DCB (IN.PACT, Admiral. Medtronic, Inc.) and DES was fluoropolymer-based DES (ELUVIA, Boston Scientific). Vessel preparation failure was defined as a residual stenosis of ≥50% and a dissection grade of D or greater on pre-dilatation angiography. The outcome measure was restenosis, and factors associated with restenosis in the DCB and DES groups were assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The 2-year restenosis rate was not significantly different between the DCB and DES groups (29%±4% vs. 24%±5%, p=0.42). Interaction analysis demonstrated that popliteal lesions and plaque burden of ≥50% were restenosis-related factors for DES but not for DCB, whereas vessel preparation failure was a factor for DCB but not for DES (p<0.05). Vessel diameter of <6 mm and nodular calcification were risk factors in both groups (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In contemporary FP lesions, smaller vessels and nodular calcification were shared restenosis-related factors for high-dose DCB and fluoropolymer-based DES. Popliteal lesions and plaque burden of ≥50% were restenosis-related factors for fluoropolymer-based DES and vessel preparation failure for high-dose DCB. CLINICAL IMPACT: Shared and differential restenosis-related factors after endovascular therapy using high-dose drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and fluoropolymer-based drug-eluting stents (DESs) in contemporary femoropopliteal (FP) lesions are unclear. This single-center retrospective study included 378 FP lesions in 273 patients with lower-extremity arterial disease (high-dose DCB, 278 lesions in 193 patients; fluoropolymer-based DES, 120 lesions in 106 patients). Smaller vessels and calcified nodules were shared restenosis-related factors for both high-dose DCB and fluoropolymer-based DES, whereas popliteal lesions and plaque burden of ≥50% were restenosis-related factors for fluoropolymer-based DES and vessel preparation failure for high-dose DCB.

Angiographic patterns of restenosis after drug-coated balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal lesions and 1-year prognosis after repeat endovascular therapy.

AIM: The aim of the current study sought to investigate the angiographic patterns of restenosis after drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions and which repeat endovascular therapy (EVT) for DCB restenosis would provide more freedom from recurrent restenosis. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included 119 limbs (chronic limb-threatening ischemia [CLTI]: 55%, lesion length: 136.9 ± 89.6 mm, chronic total occlusion: 25%) of 95 patients (diabetes mellitus: 70%, hemodialysis: 56%) who were diagnosed with DCB restenosis between January 2018 and December 2019. The cases were classified into three groups based on angiographic patterns of restenosis: Class I: focal lesions ≤50 mm, Class II: diffuse lesions >50 mm, and Class III: totally occluded lesions. The DCB restenosis patterns and frequency and predictors of recurrent restenosis after repeated EVT (re-EVT) were investigated. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 29.8 ± 9.5 months. Groups I, II, and III comprised of 30 (25.2%), 55 (46.2%), and 34 (29.0%) cases, respectively. The overall rate of 1-year freedom from recurrent restenosis was 58.2%. One-year rate of freedom from recurrent restenosis after repeat DCB was not statistically different from that after scaffolding (71.1% vs. 74.6%, respectively, p = 0.911); however, it was significantly better than that after noncoated balloon angioplasty (repeat DCB vs. noncoated balloon angioplasty: 71.1% vs. 25.7%, respectively, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CLTI (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.15, p < 0.001) and re-EVT with noncoated balloon (HR: 3.16, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with recurrent restenosis; however, Class III pattern of DCB restenosis was not associated with recurrent restenosis (HR: 1.04, p = 0.918). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed the angiographic patterns of restenosis after DCB therapy for FP lesions and the 1-year rate of recurrent restenosis after repeat revascularization. Repeat DCB therapy demonstrated acceptable 1-year recurrent restenosis rates.

Primary results of the SAVAL randomized trial of a paclitaxel-eluting nitinol stent versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in infrapopliteal arteries.

BACKGROUND: Effective and durable options for infrapopliteal artery revascularization for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) are limited. METHODS: The SAVAL trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of patients with CLTI and infrapopliteal artery lesions with total lesion length ⩽ 140 mm, stenosis ⩾ 70%, and Rutherford category 4-5 assigned 2:1 to treatment with the SAVAL self-expandable paclitaxel drug-eluting stent (DES) or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with an uncoated balloon. The primary effectiveness endpoint was primary vessel patency (i.e., core lab-adjudicated duplex ultrasound-based flow at 12 months in the absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization or surgical bypass of the target lesion). The primary safety endpoint was the 12-month major adverse event (MAE)-free rate; MAEs were defined as a composite of above-ankle index limb amputation, major reintervention, and 30-day mortality. The endpoints were prespecified for superiority (effectiveness) and noninferiority (safety) at a one-sided significance level of 2.5%. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment (N = 130 DES, N = 71 PTA). Target lesion length was 68.1 ± 35.2 mm for the DES group and 68.7 ± 49.2 mm for the PTA group, and 31.0% and 27.6% of patients, respectively, had occlusions. The 12-month primary patency rates were 68.0% for the DES group and 76.0% for the PTA group (Psuperiority = 0.8552). The MAE-free rates were 91.6% and 95.3%, respectively (Pnoninferiority = 0.0433). CONCLUSION: The SAVAL trial did not show benefit related to effectiveness and safety with the nitinol DES compared with PTA in infrapopliteal artery lesions up to 140 mm in length. Continued innovation to provide optimal treatments for CLTI is needed. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03551496).

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor use in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing endovascular therapy for symptomatic peripheral artery disease.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to reveal the prevalence of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor treatment and its association with restenosis risk in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing endovascular therapy for symptomatic peripheral artery disease. METHODS: We used the database of a multicenter prospective study registering patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease undergoing femoropopliteal drug-coated balloon treatment in Japan. The current analysis included 1058 patients with diabetes mellitus free from end-stage renal disease. The association of clinical characteristics with SGLT2 inhibitor use was investigated using the logistic regression model. The propensity score matching was adopted to compare the primary patency, i.e., freedom from restenosis, after endovascular therapy between patients treated with and without a SGLT2 inhibitor. RESULTS: The proportion of SGLT2 inhibitor treatment at revascularization was 14.8% (95% confidence interval, 12.8-17.1%). Younger age, increased body mass index, and increased hemoglobin A1c levels were independently associated with SGLT2 inhibitor use (all P < 0.05). The proportion of SGLT2 inhibitor reached 38.2% (95% confidence interval, 25.4-52.3%) in patients with the three associated factors. The propensity score-matching analysis demonstrated that primary patency was not different between patients treated with a SGLT2 inhibitor and those without it (72.0% [95% confidence interval, 64.1-80.9%] versus 67.8% [62.7-73.3%] at 2 years; P = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: SGLT2 inhibitors were not rarely used in patients with diabetes mellitus who underwent femoropopliteal endovascular therapy using a drug coated balloon for symptomatic peripheral artery disease in real-world settings. SGLT2 inhibitor treatment was not associated with an increased risk of restenosis.

Endovascular Therapy with Interwoven Nitinol Stent Placement after Predilation for Heavily Calcified Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: Results of the BURDOCK Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the 1-year and 2-year clinical outcomes of interwoven stent (IWS) implantation for symptomatic femoropopliteal arterial disease with calcification. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective multicenter study evaluated 308 limbs (63% with the peripheral arterial calcium scoring system 3 and 4 severe calcification and 87% with ≥180° calcification on intravascular ultrasound) of 299 patients (diabetes in 66.9%, chronic renal failure in 52.8%, and dialysis in 49.2%) who underwent IWS (Supera; Abbott, Abbott Park, Illinois) implantation after sufficient predilation (residual stenosis < 30%) for calcified femoropopliteal lesions. The primary outcome measure was primary patency (freedom from restenosis) at 1 and 2 years, whereas the secondary outcome measure included freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). Clinical parameters associated with loss of patency were explored. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that primary patency was 88.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.5%-92.1%) at 1 year and 80.8% (95% CI, 76.1%-85.8%) at 2 years. The CD-TLR-free rate was 96.5% and 94.8% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The characteristics associated with loss of patency were restenotic lesion with and without stent implantation (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.96 and 2.40; P = .047 and .041, respectively), chronic total occlusion (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.88; P = .022), and popliteal involvement (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.60; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of IWS after sufficient predilation for calcified femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease demonstrated clinically acceptable primary patency.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Cholesterol Crystal Embolism Accompanied by Lower Extremity Wound.

Cholesterol crystal embolism (CCE) accompanied by a lower extremity wound is occasionally difficult to differentiate from chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and treat. The present multi-center retrospective observational study investigated the clinical characteristics and prognosis of CCE with lower extremity wounds. Consecutive patients (n = 58) clinically diagnosed as CCE with lower extremity wounds between April 2010 and December 2019 were studied. CCE was diagnosed using histological findings, foot condition, renal impairment, and eosinophilia. The primary outcome was 1-year wound healing rate. Patients with CCE were compared with 1309 patients diagnosed with CLTI with tissue loss during the same study period. The CCE group had a significantly more severe Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification compared with the CLTI group. After Kaplan-Meier analysis, the CCE group had a similar 1-year wound healing (55.1 vs 58.3%, P = .096) as the CLTI group. In multivariate stratified Cox regression analysis by WIfI stages, CCE was significantly associated with poor wound healing compared with CLTI [hazard ratio .36 (95% confidence interval .21-.62)]. In conclusion, among the similar WIfI clinical stages, wound healing was significantly worse in the CCE group than in the CLTI group.